Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Conjecture

Vizing's Conjecture

Combinatorics

Vizing's conjecture, in graph theory, concerns a relation between the domination number and the Cartesian product of graphs, stating that the domination number of the product is at least the product of the two graphs' domination numbers. It was first stated by Vadim G. Vizing in 1968, and many mathematicians have since worked on it with partial results. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Statement
For graphs G and H, the domination number of the Cartesian product of G and H is at least the product of the domination numbers of G and H: gamma(G box H) >= gamma(G) gamma(H). 1
Proposed Year
1968 1
Progress Toward Resolution
Known to hold when either graph has domination number one, for cycles, and for graphs with domination number two; Clark and Suen (2000) proved the domination number of the product is at least half as large as the conjectured bound for all G and H. 1
Classification
Resolution Status
Open 1
Prize Status
Prize Status (category)
No Prize Offered 1
Connections

In Branch

Source Vizing's Conjecture (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Vizing's Conjecture (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section
    This conjecture was first stated by Vadim G. Vizing (1968)
  • Lead section, second sentence
    This conjecture was first stated by Vadim G. Vizing (1968), and states that, if γ(G) denotes the minimum number of vertices in a dominating set for the graph G, then
  • Partial results section
    Clark & Suen (2000) proved that the domination number of the product is at least half as large as the conjectured bound, for all G and H.
  • In Branch: Graph Theory, Lead sentence
    In graph theory, Vizing's conjecture concerns a relation between the domination number and the cartesian product of graphs.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.