Home›Analysis›All AnalysisBrowse ByAll AnalysisReference and ClassificationDevelopingOpen conjectures about limits, continuity and the behavior of functions, including claims reaching into physics through analytic tools. Belongs here: unproved analytic claims such as those concerning the Navier-Stokes equations or the Riemann zeta function. Does not belong here: number-theoretic conjectures that use analytic methods, filed under Number Theory, since the object of study rather than the method decides placement.FactsAll AnalysisSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsComparisonEra Of EmergenceWell-attested1670 1All AnalysisFilter Results12 entriesResolution StatusAllDisproven (2)Open (6)Partially Resolved (5)BranchAllAlgebra (1)Analysis (3)Applied and Computational Mathematics (2)Complex Analysis (2)Ergodic Theory (1)Functional Analysis (2)Linear Algebra (1)Operator Theory (1)Prize StatusAllMillennium Prize Problem (2)No Prize Offered (10)ProposedAll1917 (1)1948 (1)1959 (1)1974 (1)1978 (1)1982 (1)1987 (1)2000 (2)2004 (1)Resolved YearAll2004 (1)2020 (1)Posed ByAllAdolph Winkler Goodman (1)Alain Connes (2)Bent Fuglede (1)Blagovest Sendov (1)Michel Crouzeix (1)Difficulty HintAllAdvanced (1)Prize AmountAll1,000,000 (2)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 12Baum-Connes ConjectureAnalysisBrennan ConjectureAnalysisConnes Embedding ProblemAnalysisCrouzeix's ConjectureAnalysisFuglede's ConjectureAnalysisGoodman's ConjectureAnalysisInvariant Subspace ProblemAnalysisKakeya ConjectureAnalysisNavier-Stokes Existence and SmoothnessAnalysisSendov's ConjectureAnalysisSpectral Gap ConjectureAnalysisYang-Mills Existence and Mass GapAnalysisSources1. Wikipedia: Mathematical Analysistier 2Wikimedia FoundationHistory, Modern, Origins sectionQuote, History, Modern, Origins sectionMathematical analysis formally developed in the 17th century during the Scientific Revolution.View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.