Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Conjecture

Littlewood Conjecture

Number Theory

In Diophantine approximation, the Littlewood conjecture is an open problem concerning the simultaneous approximation of two real numbers by rational numbers with the same denominator. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Statement
An open problem in Diophantine approximation concerning the simultaneous approximation of two real numbers by rational numbers sharing the same denominator. 1
Proposed Year
1930 1
Approximate; the source states Littlewood proposed the conjecture around 1930, with no exact publication date recorded.
Progress Toward Resolution
Proved for almost every pair by Patrick Gallagher in 1962. In 2006 Manfred Einsiedler, Anatole Katok, and Elon Lindenstrauss proved that the set of possible counterexamples has Hausdorff dimension zero. No general proof or disproof exists. 1
Classification
Resolution Status
Open 1
Prize Status
Prize Status (category)
No Prize Offered 1
Sources
1. Littlewood Conjecture (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section
    the Littlewood conjecture is an open problem concerning the simultaneous approximation of two real numbers by rational numbers with the same denominator
  • Lead section, first sentence
    the Littlewood conjecture is an open problem concerning the simultaneous approximation of two real numbers by rational numbers with the same denominator
  • Lead section, second paragraph
    The conjecture was proposed by J. E. Littlewood around 1930 and remains unresolved.
  • Lead section, third paragraph
    For almost every pair, a stronger assertion was proved by Patrick Gallagher in 1962. In 2006, Manfred Einsiedler, Anatole Katok and Elon Lindenstrauss proved that the set of counterexamples has Hausdorff dimension zero, using rigidity of invariant measures for higher-rank diagonal actions on homogeneous spaces.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.