Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Dilworth's Theorem

Combinatorics and Graph Theory

In any finite partially ordered set, the minimum number of chains needed to cover every element equals the maximum size of an antichain. Proved by Robert Dilworth, it is a foundational duality theorem of order theory and combinatorics, dual to Mirsky's theorem for chains and antichains reversed.

Facts
Statement
In any finite partially ordered set, the maximum size of an antichain of incomparable elements equals the minimum number of chains needed to cover all elements. 1
Proof Year
1950 1
Classification
Statement Form
Existence Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Sources
1. Dilworth's Theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • lead paragraph, opening sentence
    in any finite partially ordered set, the maximum size of an antichain of incomparable elements equals the minimum number of chains needed to cover all elements
  • lead paragraph, sentence naming the publication year
    The theorem is named for the mathematician Robert P. Dilworth, who published it in 1950.
  • Lead section, statement-form reference
    A version of the theorem for infinite partially ordered sets states that, when there exists a decomposition into finitely many chains, or when there exists a finite upper bound on the size of an antichain, the sizes of the largest antichain and of the smallest chain decomposition are again equal.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.