Fermat's Last Theorem, first stated by Pierre de Fermat in 1637, was not proved for every exponent until Andrew Wiles's general proof in 1995. In the centuries between, mathematicians proved the theorem for particular exponents one at a time rather than all at once. Fermat himself proved the case where the exponent is 4, using the method of infinite descent, an early example of that proof technique.
Facts
Classification
Statement Form Statement Form StatementFermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers (a, b, c) can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than 2. 1 Connections
Has Statement Form
Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.
Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.
Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.
In Branch
Source Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem for specific exponents - Wikipedia
Sources
1. Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem for specific exponents - Wikipedia
Mathematical preliminaries section
Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers (a, b, c) can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than 2.
In Branch: Number Theory, Lead sentence
Fermat's Last Theorem is a theorem in number theory, originally stated by Pierre de Fermat in 1637 and proven by Andrew Wiles in 1
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.