Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Smale's Theorem (Sphere Eversion)

Topology

Smale's Theorem on Sphere Eversion is a result of differential topology showing that an ordinary sphere can be turned inside out through a continuous, smooth motion in three-dimensional space without ever cutting, tearing, or creasing its surface, a process called sphere eversion. The result is considered a veridical paradox, since it is true despite seeming, on first encounter, to contradict intuition about surfaces; it follows from Stephen Smale's more general classification of immersions up to regular homotopy.

Facts
Statement
A sphere can be turned inside out through a continuous, smooth motion in three dimensional space, allowing self intersections, without cutting, tearing, or creasing its surface. 1
Proof Year
1958 1
Classification
Statement Form
Existence Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

In Branch

Source Sphere eversion, Wikipedia

Proved By

Source Sphere eversion, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Sphere eversion, Wikipedia
  • Introduction
    It is possible to smoothly and continuously turn a sphere inside out in this way (allowing self-intersections of the sphere's surface) without cutting or tearing it or creating any crease.
  • History
    An existence proof for crease-free sphere eversion was first created by Stephen Smale (1958).
  • In Branch: Differential Topology, Lead sentence
    In differential topology, sphere eversion is a theoretical process of turning a sphere inside out in a three-dimensional space (th
  • Proved By: Stephen Smale, Lead
    An existence proof for crease-free sphere eversion was first created by Stephen Smale (1958).
  • In Group: Geometric and Differential Topology, Lead paragraph
    In differential topology, sphere eversion is a theoretical process of turning a sphere inside out in a three-dimensional space (the word eversion means "turning inside out").
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.