Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Mordell-Weil Theorem

Number Theory

The Mordell-Weil Theorem states that the group of rational points on an elliptic curve defined over a number field is finitely generated, meaning it decomposes into a finite torsion subgroup together with a free abelian group of finite rank. Named for Louis Mordell, who proved the case of the rational numbers, and André Weil, who extended it to general number fields, it is a foundational result of arithmetic geometry underlying the modern study of elliptic curves.

Facts
Statement
The group of rational points on an abelian variety defined over a number field is finitely generated; for an elliptic curve over the rational numbers this group is called the Mordell-Weil group. 1
Proof Year
1928 1
Louis Mordell proved the special case for an elliptic curve over the rational numbers in 1922, answering a question Henri Poincare had posed around 1901. Andre Weil generalized the result to abelian varieties over arbitrary number fields in his 1928 doctoral dissertation, the form this entity states.
Classification
Statement Form
Characterization Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

In Branch

Source Wolfram MathWorld: Mordell-Weil Theorem

Proved By

Source Mordell-Weil Theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Mordell-Weil Theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead paragraph, mid-sentence
    is a finitely-generated abelian group, called the Mordell-Weil group.
  • History
    Some years later André Weil took up the subject, producing the generalisation to Jacobians of higher genus curves over arbitrary number fields in his doctoral dissertation published in 1928.
  • Proved By: André Weil, Lead paragraph
    In mathematics, the Mordell-Weil theorem states that for an abelian variety
View the Source
Wolfram MathWorld: Mordell-Weil Theorem
Wolfram MathWorldIn Branch: Field Theory, Subject classifications
Quote, In Branch: Field Theory, Subject classifications
Algebra Field Theory
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.