The Hilbert-Speiser theorem is a result in algebraic number theory characterizing which cyclotomic fields possess a normal integral basis; more generally it applies to any finite abelian extension of the rational numbers, since by the Kronecker-Weber theorem every such extension is isomorphic to a subfield of a cyclotomic field. The theorem states that a finite abelian extension of the rationals has a normal integral basis if and only if it is tamely ramified over the rationals, equivalent to being a subfield of the field generated by the nth roots of unity for some squarefree odd number n. The result was introduced by David Hilbert in 1897 and by Andreas Speiser in 1916; a converse was later proved by Cornelius Greither, Daniel Replogle and Karl Rubin among others in 1999. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
StatementA finite abelian extension K/Q has a normal integral basis if and only if it is tamely ramified over Q. 2 Classification
Statement FormCharacterization Theorem 1 Connections
Has Statement Form
In Branch
Source Hilbert-Speiser theorem (Wikipedia)
Proved By
Source Hilbert-Speiser theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Hilbert-Speiser theorem
WikipediaLead section, statement-form referenceQuote, Lead section, statement-form reference
A finite abelian extension K/Q has a normal integral basis if and only if it is tamely ramified over Q.
View the Source 2. Hilbert-Speiser theorem (Wikipedia)
Hilbert-Speiser Theorem statement
A finite abelian extension K/Q has a normal integral basis if and only if it is tamely ramified over Q.
In Branch: Algebraic Number Theory, Lead section
In mathematics, the Hilbert-Speiser theorem is a result on cyclotomic fields, characterising those with a normal integral
Proved By: David Hilbert, Lead
This result was introduced by Hilbert (1897, Satz 132, 1998, theorem 132) in his Zahlbericht and by Speiser (1916, corollary to proposition 8.1).
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.