Shoenfield's Absoluteness Theorem, proved by Joseph Shoenfield in 1961, states that every Sigma-1-2 and Pi-1-2 statement of the analytical hierarchy has the same truth value in any transitive model of set theory and in that model's own constructible universe, provided both contain the same ordinals. The theorem shows that a wide class of statements, including most classical questions of analysis and descriptive set theory, cannot be shown independent of the standard ZFC axioms by the method of forcing, since a forcing extension and its ground model must agree on every statement in this class.
Facts
StatementEvery Sigma-1-2 and Pi-1-2 sentence of the analytical hierarchy, interpreted as a statement about the natural numbers, has the same truth value in a model V of ZF set theory and in that model's constructible universe L. 1 Connections
In Branch
Source Absoluteness (logic) (Wikipedia)
Proved By
Source Absoluteness (logic) (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Shoenfield's absoluteness theorem, Wikipedia
Lead sectionQuote, Lead section
The Shoenfield absoluteness theorem, due to Joseph Shoenfield (1961), establishes the absoluteness of a large class of formulas between a model of set theory and its constructible universe, with important methodological consequences.
View the Source Absoluteness (logic) (Wikipedia)
In Branch: Logic and Foundations, Lead sentence
In mathematical logic, a formula is said to be absolute to some class of structures (also called models), if it has the same truth
Proved By: Joseph R. Shoenfield, Lead
The Shoenfield absoluteness theorem, due to Joseph Shoenfield (1961), establishes the absoluteness of a large class of formulas between a model of set theory and its constructible universe, with important methodological consequences.
In Group: Set Theory, Lead section
Issues of absoluteness are particularly important in set theory and model theory, fields where multiple structures
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.