Concepts
Prime Number
Also Known As Prime
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
A natural number greater than 1 with no positive divisors other than 1 and itself: 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 and so on. Every other whole number greater than 1 can be built by multiplying primes together in exactly one way (order aside), the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which is why primes are often called the atoms of arithmetic. Euclid gave the first surviving proof that they never run out, in Book IX of the Elements around 300 BCE, an argument students still meet essentially unchanged today (the atlas carries this as its own theorem, Infinitude of Primes). Eratosthenes' sieve, an ancient method of systematically striking out multiples to leave only primes behind, is still taught as the simplest way to find every prime below a given bound. Their apparent randomness within a rigid rule (no formula predicts where the next one falls, yet their distribution follows precise statistical laws) has made them a central object of number theory ever since, and, in a development none of the ancient sources could have anticipated, the practical difficulty of factoring a large number back into its prime components is what modern RSA encryption relies on to keep data secure.
Facts
Origin YearThe concept itself was almost certainly informally known earlier; 300 BCE marks Euclid's Elements, the earliest surviving rigorous treatment. Learn More
The Atoms of Arithmetic
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
Chemistry has its periodic table because every substance breaks down into a fixed, finite list of elements combined in different ratios. Arithmetic has an equivalent, and it is older by more than two thousand years: every whole number greater than one is built from primes, multiplied together, in exactly one way. Twelve is two times two times three and nothing else; there is no second recipe. Euclid proved, in Book IX of the Elements, that the supply of these atoms never runs out, with an argument that remains one of the cleanest in all of mathematics: assume there is a longest possible list of primes, multiply them all together and add one, and the new number must either be prime itself or divisible by a prime not on the supposed complete list, either way contradicting the assumption. What Euclid could not have anticipated is how strange the primes would turn out to be at larger scales. No formula predicts where the next one falls; twin primes, pairs two apart like 11 and 13, keep appearing at every scale mathematicians have checked, and nobody has proved they do not eventually stop (the atlas's own Twin Prime Conjecture is exactly that unresolved question). And in the twentieth century, the very unpredictability that made primes a matter of pure curiosity for two millennia became the foundation of a very practical problem: modern encryption relies on the fact that multiplying two large primes together is easy, and working backward from the product to find the original primes is, for now, hard enough to keep secrets safe.
Why the Internet Trusts a Hard Problem
This article records tradition as it has been passed down and reported. Its sources are not yet part of the atlas's verified catalogue.
RSA encryption, the scheme quietly securing an enormous share of the traffic moving across the internet, rests on an asymmetry that has nothing to do with computers and everything to do with a fact Euclid would have recognized: multiplying two large prime numbers together is fast, but taking the resulting product and working backward to find the two primes that made it is, for numbers large enough, so slow that no known method does it in any practical amount of time. A computer can multiply two three-hundred-digit primes in a fraction of a second; recovering those same two primes from the product alone, with every classical computer on earth working together, could take longer than the universe has existed. RSA's public-key system builds a lock directly out of that gap: the product of the two primes is published openly as part of the public key, doing no harm because reversing it is infeasible, while the two primes themselves stay private and let their owner, and only their owner, decrypt what the public key was used to encrypt. It is worth being honest about the asymmetry's limits rather than treating it as permanent: a sufficiently large quantum computer, running an algorithm published by Peter Shor in 1994, could factor these products efficiently, which is why cryptographers are already building the next generation of schemes that do not depend on this particular hard problem holding forever.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Elements Book IX proves the primes never run out, c. 300 BCE.
The atlas's own theorem proving there are infinitely many primes.
The atlas's own still-open conjecture about pairs of primes two apart.
In Branch
Sources
Frequently Asked Questions
Is 1 a prime number?
No; a prime needs exactly two divisors, and 1 has only one.
No, by the standard modern definition a prime number must have exactly two positive divisors, 1 and itself, and 1 has only one. Excluding 1 also keeps the fundamental theorem of arithmetic true as stated: every integer greater than 1 factors into primes in exactly one way, which would fail if 1 counted as a prime, since any number could then pick up extra factors of 1 without changing its value.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.