Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Bondareva-Shapley Theorem

Game Theory

The Bondareva-Shapley Theorem characterizes when the core of a cooperative game with transferable payoffs is nonempty, meaning some way of dividing the grand coalition's total value leaves no smaller coalition better off acting alone, showing this holds exactly when the game is balanced in a precise technical sense. Named for Olga Bondareva and Lloyd Shapley, who proved it independently, it is a foundational existence result of cooperative game theory.

Facts
Statement
The core of a cooperative game with transferable payoffs is non-empty if and only if the game is balanced. 2
Proof Year
1963 2
Classification
Statement Form
Characterization Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

In Branch

Source Bondareva-Shapley theorem - Wikipedia

Proved By

Source Bondareva-Shapley theorem - Wikipedia
Source Bondareva-Shapley theorem - Wikipedia
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Bondareva-Shapley theorem
WikipediaLead section, statement-form reference
Quote, Lead section, statement-form reference
Specifically, the game's core is non-empty if and only if the game is balanced.
View the Source
2. Bondareva-Shapley theorem - Wikipedia
  • Theorem section
    The game's core is non-empty if and only if the game is balanced.
  • References section
    Bondareva, Olga N. (1963). Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games (In Russian). Problemy Kybernetiki.
  • In Branch: Game Theory, Lead sentence
  • Proved By: Olga Bondareva, Lead sentence, attribution
    formulated independently by Olga Bondareva and Lloyd Shapley
  • Proved By: Lloyd Shapley, Lead sentence, attribution
    formulated independently by Olga Bondareva and Lloyd Shapley
  • In Group: Equilibria, Bargaining and Cooperative Games, Lead paragraph
    The Bondareva-Shapley theorem, in game theory, describes a necessary and sufficient condition for the non-emptiness of the core of a cooperative game in characteristic function form.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.