Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Mathematical Object

Fermat Number

Number Theory

A Fermat number is a positive integer of the form two raised to a power of two, itself raised to some exponent, plus one, written Fn for the exponent n, so that the first few Fermat numbers are three, five, seventeen, two hundred fifty-seven, and sixty-five thousand five hundred thirty-seven. They are named after the French mathematician Pierre de Fermat, who conjectured in the seventeenth century that every number of this form is prime, a claim that holds for the first five Fermat numbers but was disproved in 1732 by Leonhard Euler, who showed that the sixth one factors into smaller primes. No further prime Fermat numbers have ever been found beyond the first five, despite extensive computer searches of much larger candidates, and it remains an open question whether any more exist at all. Fermat numbers are also connected to geometry through a theorem of Carl Friedrich Gauss, who showed that a regular polygon can be constructed using only a compass and straightedge if its number of sides is a power of two multiplied by any number of distinct prime Fermat numbers.

Facts
Classification
Object Kind
Number 1
Connections

Attributed To

Source Wikipedia: Fermat number

Is Kind Of Object

Entity-backed identity for the object-kind enum value this mathematical object already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The object-kind fact itself stays on the object unchanged.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Fermat number
  • Introduction, opening sentence
    In mathematics, a Fermat number, named after Pierre de Fermat (1601-1665), the first known to have studied them, is a positive integer of the form:
  • Attributed To: Pierre de Fermat, Lead paragraph
    the first known to have studied them
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.