A continued fraction is a mathematical expression written as a fraction whose denominator contains a sum involving another fraction, which may itself be simple or itself a continued fraction. If the process of nesting fractions this way terminates in a simple fraction the result is called a finite continued fraction, and if it continues indefinitely the result is an infinite continued fraction; the special case in which every numerator equals one and every denominator is a positive integer is called a simple, or regular, continued fraction. Any positive rational number can be written as a finite simple continued fraction, and any positive irrational number can be written as an infinite simple continued fraction. Different fields of mathematics favor different terminology: in number theory the unqualified term continued fraction usually means a simple continued fraction, with the broader case called a generalized continued fraction, while in complex analysis and numerical analysis the unqualified term usually refers to the broader, general case.
Facts
Connections
Is Kind Of Object
Entity-backed identity for the object-kind enum value this mathematical object already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The object-kind fact itself stays on the object unchanged.
Entity-backed identity for the object-kind enum value this mathematical object already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The object-kind fact itself stays on the object unchanged.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Continued fraction
History sectionQuote, History section
Nearly two thousand years passed before Bombelli (1579) devised a technique for approximating the roots of quadratic equations with continued fractions in the mid-sixteenth century.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.