Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Mathematical Object

Liouville Number

Number Theory

A Liouville number is a real number that, for every positive integer n, can be approximated by some ratio of two integers p over q, with q greater than 1, more closely than the bound 1 over q to the power of n. In 1844, Joseph Liouville proved a limit on how well algebraic numbers can be approximated by rational numbers, and he defined Liouville numbers specifically to have rational approximations better than that bound allows, which showed for the first time that transcendental numbers exist. One example is Liouville's constant, a decimal whose digit after the decimal point is 1 exactly when its position is the factorial of a positive integer and 0 otherwise; pi and e, though themselves transcendental, are not Liouville numbers.

Facts
Classification
Object Kind
Number 1
Origin Year
1844 1
Connections

Attributed To

Source Liouville number, Wikipedia

In Branch

Source Liouville number, Wikipedia

Is Kind Of Object

Entity-backed identity for the object-kind enum value this mathematical object already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The object-kind fact itself stays on the object unchanged.

Sources
1. Liouville number, Wikipedia
  • History section
    In 1844, Joseph Liouville proved a bound showing that there is a limit to how well algebraic numbers can be approximated by rational numbers
  • Lead paragraph
    In number theory, a Liouville number is a real number x with the property that, for every positive integer n, there exists a pair of integers (p,q) with q > 1
  • In Branch: Number Theory, Lead sentence
    In number theory, a Liouville number is a real number x with the property that, for every positive integer n , there exists a pair
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.