Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Mathematical Object

Hawk-Dove Game

Mathematical Physics, Biology and Game Theory

The Hawk-Dove game is a model in evolutionary game theory describing conflict between individuals competing for a shared, indivisible resource, in which each individual can adopt a Hawk strategy, escalating the contest and risking injury, or a Dove strategy, displaying but retreating before real conflict. It was introduced in 1973 by the biologist John Maynard Smith and the geneticist George Price as part of their foundational paper defining the evolutionarily stable strategy, a concept borrowed from economic game theory and adapted to explain how a mixture of aggressive and passive behaviors can be stable within an animal population even though pure aggression would seem to be individually advantageous. Because escalated fights carry a real cost of injury, the model shows that when the cost of losing a fight outweighs the value of the resource being contested, a stable population settles into a mix of hawk-like and dove-like individuals, or into individuals who mix the two strategies at random, rather than an all-hawk population destroying itself.

Facts
Classification
Object Kind
Game 1
Origin Year
1973 1
Connections

In Branch

Source Chicken (game) (Wikipedia)

Is Kind Of Object

Entity-backed identity for the object-kind enum value this mathematical object already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The object-kind fact itself stays on the object unchanged.

Sources
1. Wikipedia: Hawk-Dove game
Introduction
Quote, Introduction
The earliest presentation of a form of the Hawk-Dove game was by John Maynard Smith and George Price in their paper, "The logic of animal conflict".
View the Source
Chicken (game) (Wikipedia)
In Branch: Game Theory, Lead sentence
Quote, In Branch: Game Theory, Lead sentence
t game, is a model of conflict for two players in game theory.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.