Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Mathematical Object

Inhabited Set

Logic, Foundations and Set Theory

An inhabited set is a set for which a specific element can be exhibited or constructed, a notion used in constructive mathematics in place of the classical idea of a nonempty set, which only asserts that no element of the set could possibly be absent without exhibiting one. In classical logic built on the law of excluded middle, every nonempty set is automatically inhabited, so the two notions collapse into a single idea, but in constructive systems that reject that law, it is possible to prove a set is not empty, in the sense that assuming it has no elements leads to a contradiction, without being able to produce any actual element of it, which is exactly the gap the stronger inhabited property is designed to close. The distinction matters throughout constructive analysis, constructive set theory, and the closely related fields of intuitionistic mathematics and type theory, where a genuine construction, rather than an indirect proof by contradiction, is required to establish that a set has a member. The concept became especially important with the development of Per Martin-Lof's intuitionistic type theory in the 1970s, in which a type is inhabited exactly when a term of that type can actually be constructed, tying the mathematical notion directly to the practice of writing formal proofs as programs.

Facts
Classification
Object Kind
Set 1
Connections

In Branch

Source Inhabited set (Wikipedia)

Is Kind Of Object

Sets, Concepts
Sources
1. Inhabited Set (Wikipedia)
Lead section
Inhabited set (Wikipedia)
In Branch: Set Theory, Lead paragraph
Quote, In Branch: Set Theory, Lead paragraph
However, this equivalence is not valid in constructive or intuitionistic logic, and so this separate terminology is mostly used in the set theory of constructive mathematics.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.