Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Mathematical Object

Rayleigh Dissipation Function

Mathematical Physics, Biology and Game Theory

The Rayleigh dissipation function, named after Lord Rayleigh, who introduced it in 1873, is a function used in Lagrangian mechanics to account for the effect of velocity-proportional frictional forces that ordinary Lagrangian mechanics, built from kinetic and potential energy alone, cannot represent directly. When the frictional force on a particle is proportional to its velocity, the function can be written as half the sum, over every particle in the system, of frictional damping coefficients multiplied by the squares of the particle's velocity components; the frictional force is then the negative gradient of this function with respect to velocity, entering the Euler-Lagrange equations as a non-conservative term. Since the 1970s the function is more often called the Rayleigh dissipation potential, and the original quadratic form has since been generalized to convex, non-quadratic dissipation potentials that produce nonlinear friction laws such as Coulomb friction and plasticity. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Classification
Object Kind
Function 1
Origin Year
1873 1
first introduced by him in 1873
Connections

In Branch

Source Rayleigh Dissipation Function (Wikipedia)

Is Kind Of Object

Functions, Concepts
Sources
1. Rayleigh Dissipation Function (Wikipedia)
  • Lead section
    In physics, the Rayleigh dissipation function, named after Lord Rayleigh, is a function used to handle the effects of velocity-proportional frictional forces in Lagrangian mechanics.
  • In Branch: Mathematical Physics, Lead
    is a function used to handle the effects of velocity-proportional frictional forces in Lagrangian mechanics
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.