Dana Stewart Scott, born on 11 October 1932 in Berkeley, California, is a retired American logician. With Michael O. Rabin he received the 1976 ACM Turing Award for their joint work on automata theory, which introduced nondeterministic finite automata. He also made seminal contributions to modal logic, set theory and the theory of programming languages, and created domain theory, a branch of mathematics that gives a foundation to the semantics of programming languages and computability. He took his Ph.D. at Princeton in 1958 under Alonzo Church, with a dissertation on convergent sequences of complete Boolean algebras. He proved that the axiom of constructibility is incompatible with a measurable cardinal, formulated Boolean-valued models in his 1967 analysis of the independence of the continuum hypothesis, and with Richard Montague found the generalisation of Kripke semantics now called Scott-Montague semantics. With Christopher Strachey at Oxford he developed the Scott-Strachey approach to denotational semantics. He later taught at Carnegie Mellon University, and proposed equilogical spaces as a successor to domain theory.
Facts
Connections
In Branch
Source Dana Scott (Wikipedia)
Source Dana Scott (Wikipedia)
Mentored By
Source Dana Scott (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Same As
Also in Computing Atlas: the same subject.
Also in Science Atlas: the same subject.
Nationality
Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.
Source Dana Scott (Wikipedia)Lead, nationality / cultureQuote, Lead, nationality / culture
is a retired American logician
Sources
1. Dana Scott (Wikipedia)
Lead
born October 11, 1932
Lead, gender
He has made seminal contributions to automata theory
Lead, nationality / culture
is a retired American logician
In Branch: Set Theory, Lead, set theory
seminal contributions to automata theory, modal logic, set theory
Mentored By: Alonzo Church, Early life and education
under the supervision of the mathematical logician Alonzo Church
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.