Mathematicians
Shinichi Mochizuki
Modern
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Japanese mathematician at the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, known for work in anabelian geometry, including a 1996 solution of a form of the Grothendieck conjecture. From 2012 he developed a body of work he calls inter-universal Teichmuller theory, which he presents as proving the abc conjecture; the claim remains disputed, most prominently by Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix, who identified what they describe as a serious gap in the argument. Mochizuki is intensely private, rarely travels outside Japan, and communicates chiefly through his own website.
Facts
Nationality / Culture Defining ContributionDeveloped inter-universal Teichmuller theory from 2012, presented as a proof of the abc conjecture; the mathematics community remains divided on whether the proof is correct, with Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix identifying a disputed gap in 2018. 3 Notable WorkInter-universal Teichmuller Theory I to IV (Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 2021) 4 AwardFall Prize of the Mathematical Society of Japan (1997, with H. Nakamura and A. Tamagawa); Japan Academy Medal (2005) 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Why this is disputed. Mochizuki claims his inter-universal Teichmuller theory proves the conjecture; this claim is genuinely disputed, most prominently by Peter Scholze and Jakob Stix. See the dissent recorded on this edge.
In Branch
Works in number theory and arithmetic geometry; developed inter-universal Teichmuller theory in pursuit of the abc conjecture.
Sources
1. Mochizuki, Official Curriculum Vitae, RIMS Kyoto University
Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto UniversityView the Source 2. Shinichi Mochizuki (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationinfoboxQuote, infobox
Born (1969-03-29) March 29, 1969
View the Source 2. Shinichi Mochizuki (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundationlead sectionQuote, lead section
Shinichi Mochizuki is a Japanese mathematician working in number theory and arithmetic geometry. He is one of the main contributors to anabelian geometry.
View the Source 3. Klarreich, Titans of Mathematics Clash Over ABC Conjecture (2018)
Erica Klarreich, Quanta Magazine, September 20, 2018, 2018Article bodyQuote, Article body
Posted online in 2012, Mochizuki's papers supposedly prove the abc conjecture, one of the most far-reaching problems in number theory.
View the Source 4. Castelvecchi, Mathematical Proof That Rocked Number Theory Will Be Published (2020)
Davide Castelvecchi, Nature, volume 580, April 9, 2020, page 177
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Associated With: ABC Conjecture
After spending a week in Kyoto in March 2018 discussing the proof directly with Mochizuki, Scholze and Stix concluded in a report titled Why abc is still a conjecture that there is a serious, in their view unfixable, gap in the argument, centered on a step called Corollary 3.12. Stix described the problem as an inequality where the measuring stick is shrunk by a factor nobody controls, so that control over what the inequality actually means is lost; the situation has also been compared to M.C. Escher's winding staircase, where local steps look consistent but fail to close up around the loop. Scholze has said he was entirely unable to follow the logic of the proof past a specific figure in Corollary 3.12, and that he still considers the abc conjecture open. Mochizuki has responded that the criticisms stem from fundamental misunderstandings of his theory. The papers were nonetheless accepted for publication in 2020 by the journal Mochizuki himself edits, without the disputed mathematics being changed, and most number theorists have not accepted the proof as resolving the conjecture.
A dissenting reading, from Peter Scholze and Jakob StixErica Klarreich, Klarreich, Titans of Mathematics Clash Over ABC Conjecture (2018), Quanta Magazine, September 20, 2018, 2018
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.