Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Trakhtenbrot's Theorem

Logic and Foundations

Trakhtenbrot's Theorem states that the set of first-order sentences valid on every finite structure is not decidable, meaning no algorithm can determine in general whether a given first-order sentence holds in all finite models. Named for Boris Trakhtenbrot, it shows that finite model theory does not inherit the completeness and decidability properties available for first-order logic over arbitrary structures, since validity on finite models and validity in general diverge in this fundamental way.

Facts
Statement
The problem of validity in first-order logic on the class of all finite models is undecidable. 1
Proof Year
1950 1
Classification
Statement Form
Impossibility Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

In Branch

Source Trakhtenbrot's theorem (Wikipedia)
Source Trakhtenbrot's theorem (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Credited To

Also in Computing Atlas: credited with this subject.

Sources
1. Trakhtenbrot's theorem (Wikipedia)
  • Mathematical formulation section
    The problem of validity in first-order logic on the class of all finite models is undecidable.
  • Opening section, publication sentence
    The theorem was first published in 1950
  • In Branch: Model Theory, Lead paragraph
    In logic, finite model theory, and computability theory, Trakhtenbrot's theorem (due to Boris Trakhtenbrot) states that the problem of validity in first-order logic on the class of all finite models is undecidable.
  • In Branch: Computability Theory, Lead paragraph
    In logic, finite model theory, and computability theory, Trakhtenbrot's theorem (due to Boris Trakhtenbrot) states that the problem of validity in first-order logic on the class of all finite models is undecidable.
  • In Group: Mathematical Logic and Model Theory, Lead section
    In logic, finite model theory, and computability theory, Trakhtenbrot's theorem
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.