Herbrand's Theorem gives a way to reduce the question of whether a formula of first-order logic is provable to a question about a finite disjunction of substitution instances of that formula, built from terms drawn from a fixed domain called the Herbrand universe. Named for Jacques Herbrand, it is a foundational result of proof theory that underlies automated theorem-proving methods such as resolution.
Facts
StatementA first-order formula in prenex form with only existential quantifiers is provable if and only if some finite disjunction of ground substitution instances of its quantifier-free part, built from terms of the Herbrand universe, is a tautology of propositional logic, reducing first-order provability to a propositional question. Obtained by Jacques Herbrand in 1930. 1 Classification
Statement Form Statement FormCharacterization Theorem 1 Connections
Has Statement Form
In Branch
Principal Result Of
Source Jacques Herbrand, Biography (MacTutor History of Mathematics)
Proved By
Source Herbrand's Theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Herbrand's Theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundationlead paragraph, first two sentences
Herbrand's theorem is a fundamental result of mathematical logic obtained by Jacques Herbrand (1930). It essentially allows a certain kind of reduction of first-order logic to propositional logic.
Proved By: Jacques Herbrand, Lead section
Herbrand's theorem is a fundamental result of mathematical logic obtained by Jacques Herbrand (1930).
In Group: Mathematical Logic and Model Theory, Lead section
Herbrand's theorem is a fundamental result of mathematical logic obtained by Jacques Herbrand (1930). It essentially
View the Source Jacques Herbrand, Biography (MacTutor History of Mathematics)
Principal Result Of: Jacques Herbrand, Biography textQuote, Principal Result Of: Jacques Herbrand, Biography text
He made contributions to mathematical logic where Herbrand's theorem on the theory of quantifiers appears in his doctoral thesis.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.