Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Lindemann-Weierstrass Theorem

Number Theory

The Lindemann-Weierstrass Theorem states that if a finite set of algebraic numbers is linearly independent over the rationals, then the exponentials of those numbers are algebraically independent. Proved by Ferdinand von Lindemann and extended by Karl Weierstrass, it implies that both e and pi are transcendental numbers and, in particular, settled the ancient problem of squaring the circle by straightedge and compass in the negative.

Facts
Statement
The Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem states that if a set of algebraic numbers is linearly independent over the rational numbers, then their exponentials are algebraically independent over the algebraic numbers; it is the theorem that proves e and pi are both transcendental. 1
Proof Year
1885 1
Lindemann proved the restricted single-exponential case in 1882 (enough to show pi transcendental); Weierstrass generalized it to the full theorem in 1885, giving the theorem its usual joint name.
Classification
Statement Form
Characterization Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Proved By

Sources
1. Lindemann-Weierstrass Theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section, opening sentence
    In transcendental number theory, the Lindemann-Weierstrass theorem is a result that is very useful in establishing the transcendence of numbers.
  • Lead section, naming paragraph
    Lindemann proved in 1882 that eα is transcendental for every non-zero algebraic number α, thereby establishing that π is transcendental (see below). Weierstrass proved the above more general statement in 1885.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.