Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Linnik's Theorem

Number Theory

Linnik's Theorem answers a natural question left open by Dirichlet's Theorem on Arithmetic Progressions, showing that the least prime number appearing in an arithmetic progression of common difference d is bounded above by a constant multiple of d raised to a fixed power, rather than growing without any controlled rate as d increases. Named for Yuri Vladimirovich Linnik, who proved it in 1944, the theorem established that both the constant and the exponent are computable in principle, though Linnik's own proof did not supply their numerical values.

Facts
Statement
There exist positive constants c and L such that the least prime p(a,d) in the arithmetic progression a + nd, for coprime positive integers a and d with 1 <= a <= d - 1, satisfies p(a,d) < c d^L. 1
Proof Year
1944 1
Classification
Statement Form
Existence Theorem 1
Statement Form
Inequality 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

Inequality, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Source Linnik's theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Linnik's theorem (Wikipedia)
  • Introduction, sentence 1
    It asserts that there exist positive c and L such that, if we denote p(a,d) the least prime in the arithmetic progression
  • Introduction, sentence 2
    who proved it in 1944
  • In Branch: Analytic Number Theory, Lead sentence
    Linnik's theorem in analytic number theory answers a natural question after Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.