Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Ankeny-Artin-Chowla Congruence

Number Theory

The Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence is a result in number theory published in 1953 by N. C. Ankeny, Emil Artin and S. Chowla. It concerns the class number of a real quadratic field with positive discriminant, relating it by a congruence modulo a prime to the field's fundamental unit. A related form of the congruence, tied to Bernoulli numbers, holds when the discriminant is itself a prime congruent to one modulo four. The result has since been generalized further by other authors. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Statement
For a real quadratic field of discriminant d greater than zero, the class number of the field satisfies a stated congruence modulo the field's prime, linking the class number to properties of the field's fundamental unit. 1
Proof Year
1953 1
Classification
Statement Form
Inequality 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Inequality, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Source Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence (Wikipedia)

Proved By

Source Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence (Wikipedia)
  • Lead section
    the Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence is a result published in 1953 by N. C. Ankeny, Emil Artin and S. Chowla.
  • In Branch: Number Theory, Lead sentence
  • Proved By: Emil Artin, Lead paragraph
    In number theory, the Ankeny-Artin-Chowla congruence is a result published in 1953 by N. C. Ankeny, Emil Artin and S. Chowla. It concerns the class number
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.