Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Bohr-van Leeuwen Theorem

Mathematical Physics

The Bohr-van Leeuwen Theorem states that when magnetism is analyzed using classical statistical mechanics and classical electrodynamics alone, a system in thermal equilibrium has exactly zero net magnetization, so magnetism cannot arise at all within a purely classical physical theory. Named for Niels Bohr and Hendrika Johanna van Leeuwen, it is a foundational no-go result showing that the phenomenon of magnetism is inescapably a quantum mechanical effect, with no classical explanation possible even in principle.

Facts
Statement
When statistical mechanics and classical mechanics are applied consistently, the thermal average of the magnetization is always zero. 1
Proof Year
1911 1
Classification
Statement Form
Identity or Equation 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Equation, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

Identity, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

Sources
1. Bohr-Van Leeuwen theorem (Wikipedia)
  • Introduction
    The Bohr-Van Leeuwen theorem states that when statistical mechanics and classical mechanics are applied consistently, the thermal average of the magnetization is always zero.
  • History
    What is today known as the Bohr-Van Leeuwen theorem was discovered by Niels Bohr in 1911 in his doctoral dissertation
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.