The Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem is a result in combinatorial design theory giving necessary conditions for the existence of a symmetric block design. Bruck and Ryser proved it for projective planes in 1949 and Chowla and Ryser extended it to general symmetric designs in 1950; it requires that when the design parameter v is even, the quantity k minus lambda must be a perfect square, and when v is odd, a related Diophantine equation must have a nontrivial solution, a condition strong enough to rule out projective planes of orders 6 and 14 even though satisfying it does not by itself guarantee a design exists.
Facts
Classification
Statement Form Connections
Has Statement Form
In Branch
Source Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (Wikipedia)
Principal Result Of
Source H. J. Ryser (Wikipedia)
Source R. H. Bruck (Wikipedia)
Proved By
Source Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (Wikipedia)
Source Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (Wikipedia)
Lead section
The Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem is a result on the combinatorics of symmetric block designs that implies nonexistence of certain kinds of design.
- In Branch: Combinatorics, Lead sentence
View the Source2. Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem lead paragraph (w-bbfill-psymath4-0926)
proved in the case of projective planes by Bruck & Ryser (1949
Proved By: Richard Bruck, Lead sentence
The theorem was proved in the case of projective planes by Bruck & Ryser (1949).
Proved By: Herbert John Ryser, Lead sentence
The theorem was proved in the case of projective planes by Bruck & Ryser (1949).
View the SourceH. J. Ryser (Wikipedia)
Principal Result Of: Herbert John Ryser, Lead, principal resultQuote, Principal Result Of: Herbert John Ryser, Lead, principal result
He is the namesake of the Bruck-Ryser-Chowla theorem
View the Source R. H. Bruck (Wikipedia)
Principal Result Of: Richard Bruck, BiographyQuote, Principal Result Of: Richard Bruck, Biography
became known as the Bruck-Ryser theorem
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.