Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Earnshaw's Theorem

Mathematical Physics

A collection of point charges cannot be held in a stable stationary equilibrium purely by electrostatic forces alone. Proved by Samuel Earnshaw, it explains why static electric or magnetic fields alone cannot levitate a charged object without additional stabilizing forces.

Facts
Statement
A collection of point charges interacting only through the classical inverse-square electrostatic force cannot be held in a stable stationary equilibrium by that force alone. Because the electrostatic potential has no local minimum in free space, any such configuration always has at least one charge that a small displacement pushes further away rather than back toward equilibrium. 1
Proof Year
1842 1
Classification
Statement Form
Existence Theorem 1
Statement Form
Inequality 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

Inequality, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Sources
1. Earnshaw's Theorem (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundation
  • Lead section
    This was first proven by British mathematician Samuel Earnshaw in 1842.
  • Lead section, first sentence
    Earnshaw's theorem states that a collection of point charges cannot be maintained in a stable stationary equilibrium configuration solely by the electrostatic interaction of the charges.
  • Lead section, second sentence
    This was first proven by British mathematician Samuel Earnshaw in 1842.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.