Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Theorems

Four Color Theorem

Also Known As Four Color Map Theorem
Topology

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The theorem that any map drawn on a plane can be colored with only four colors so that no two regions sharing a border receive the same color. Francis Guthrie posed the conjecture around 1852 while coloring a map of the counties of England; his brother Frederick brought it to Augustus De Morgan's attention that October. Alfred Bray Kempe announced a proof in 1879 that stood for eleven years until Percy John Heawood found a defect in it in 1890, and an independent 1880 attempt by Peter Guthrie Tait was shown flawed by Julius Petersen in 1891. Kenneth Appel and Wolfgang Haken, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, finally proved the theorem in 1976 using an unavoidable set of reducible configurations checked by computer, roughly 1,900 configurations reduced from Appel and Haken's own working set, using around 1,200 hours of computer time; it was the first major theorem ever proved with a step that could not be verified by a human reading it line by line, which set off a genuine and lasting debate over whether such a proof counts as a proof in the traditional sense. A German student, Ulrich Schmidt, found an error in the original reducibility procedure a few years after publication, corrected within about two weeks; Appel and Haken addressed it in their 1989 book. In 1997 Neil Robertson, Daniel Sanders, Paul Seymour and Robin Thomas published a simplified, still computer-assisted proof cutting the unavoidable set to 633 configurations and the discharging rules from over 300 to 32. In 2005 Georges Gonthier produced a fully machine-checked proof in the Coq proof assistant, removing reliance on any unverified custom program or unreviewable manual step.

Facts
Statement
Every map drawn in the plane, with regions that are each connected, can be colored using at most four colors so that no two regions sharing a border are given the same color. 1
Proof Year
1976 1
Cross-Tradition Connections

In Branch

Posed By

Proved By

Sources
1. Thomas, The Four Color Theorem (Faculty Reference Page)
Robin Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of MathematicsOn the proof
Quote, On the proof
The first proof needs a computer. The second can be checked by hand in a few months, or, using a computer, it can be verified in about 20 minutes.
View the Source
1. Thomas, The Four Color Theorem (Faculty Reference Page)
Robin Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of MathematicsProved By: Kenneth AppelView the Source
1. Thomas, The Four Color Theorem (Faculty Reference Page)
Robin Thomas, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of MathematicsProved By: Wolfgang HakenView the Source
MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive
University of St Andrews, School of Mathematics and StatisticsPosed By: Francis Guthrie, https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/HistTopics/The_four_colour_theorem/View the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Proved By: Kenneth Appel

Robin Thomas, who with Neil Robertson, Daniel Sanders and Paul Seymour published a simplified but still computer-assisted proof of the theorem in 1997, has written that part of the Appel-Haken proof uses a computer and cannot be verified by hand, and that even the part that is supposedly hand-checkable is extraordinarily complicated and tedious. The objection is not that the theorem is false, every attempt to verify it independently, including a fully machine-checked formal proof by Georges Gonthier in 2005, has confirmed it, but that a proof containing a step no human can read and check line by line changes what counts as mathematical justification, a question the philosopher Thomas Tymoczko raised in a 1979 paper in the Journal of Philosophy that remains cited in discussions of the theorem's significance.

A dissenting reading, from Robin ThomasRobin Thomas, Thomas, The Four Color Theorem (Faculty Reference Page), Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Mathematics
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.