The Nagell-Lutz theorem is a result in diophantine geometry about rational torsion points on elliptic curves defined by non-singular cubic equations with integer coefficients. It states that any rational point of finite order on such a curve either has both coordinates as integers, or has y-coordinate zero and so has order two, and that whenever the y-coordinate is nonzero it must divide the curve's discriminant. The theorem was discovered independently by the Norwegian mathematician Trygve Nagell, who published it in 1935, and by Elisabeth Lutz, who published it in 1937, and it has since been generalized to arbitrary number fields and to more general cubic equations.
Facts
Classification
Statement FormCharacterization Theorem 1 Connections
Has Statement Form
In Branch
Source Nagell-Lutz theorem (Wikipedia)
Principal Result Of
Source Élisabeth Lutz (Wikipedia)
Proved By
Source Nagell-Lutz Theorem (Wikipedia)
Source Nagell-Lutz Theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Nagell-Lutz theorem (Wikipedia)
Statement of the theorem
If P = (x,y) is a rational point of finite order on E, for the elliptic curve group law, then:
Article text
The result is named for its two independent discoverers, the Norwegian Trygve Nagell (1895-1988) who published it in 1935, and Élisabeth Lutz (1937).
In Branch: Number Theory, Lead section
In mathematics, the Nagell-Lutz theorem is a result in the diophantine geometry of elliptic curves, which describes rational torsion points on elliptic
View the SourceÉlisabeth Lutz (Wikipedia)
Principal Result Of: Élisabeth Lutz, Lead, principal resultQuote, Principal Result Of: Élisabeth Lutz, Lead, principal result
it is named after Lutz and Trygve Nagell, who both published it in the 1930s.
View the Source Nagell-Lutz Theorem (Wikipedia)
Proved By: Trygve Nagell, Lead sentence
It is named for Trygve Nagell and Élisabeth Lutz.
Proved By: Élisabeth Lutz, Lead sentence
It is named for Trygve Nagell and Élisabeth Lutz.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.