Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Polya Enumeration Theorem

Combinatorics and Graph Theory

The Polya Enumeration Theorem counts the number of distinct configurations of objects, such as colorings of a shape's vertices, once configurations related by a specified group of symmetries are treated as identical, by evaluating a generating-function expression called the cycle index of that symmetry group. Named for George Polya, who built it on the earlier Burnside's Lemma, it is a foundational tool of combinatorial enumeration used, for example, to count distinct necklaces, colorings of a cube's faces, or chemical isomers related by molecular symmetry.

Facts
Partially Attested
Proof Year
1927 1
First published by Redfield in 1927 and independently rediscovered by Polya in 1937; 1927 given as first publication.
Classification
Statement Form
Identity or Equation 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Equation, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

Identity, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Source Polya enumeration theorem (Wikipedia)

Proved By

Source Polya enumeration theorem (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Polya enumeration theorem (Wikipedia)
  • History
    The theorem was first published by J. Howard Redfield in 1927.
  • In Branch: Combinatorics, Lead sentence
  • Proved By: George Polya, Lead paragraph
    The Pólya enumeration theorem, also known as the Redfield-Pólya theorem and Pólya counting, is a theorem in combinatorics that both
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.