Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Mathematicians

Grigori Perelman

IPA: [pʲɪrʲɪlʲˈman] (Russian); commonly anglicized with stress on the final syllable.
Modern

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Russian mathematician who proved the Poincare conjecture and the more general geometrization conjecture between 2002 and 2003 by completing a program begun by Richard Hamilton using the Ricci flow, posting three papers to the arXiv preprint server rather than submitting to a journal. Multiple independent teams spent years verifying the proof before the mathematical community accepted it as correct. In 2006 Perelman was awarded the Fields Medal, the first person ever to decline it; in 2010 he was awarded the Clay Mathematics Institute's one million dollar Millennium Prize for the same work and declined that too, saying he considered Richard Hamilton's contribution no less than his own and citing his disagreement with the ethical standards of the organized mathematics community. He resigned from the Steklov Institute in December 2005 and has since lived reclusively in Saint Petersburg.

Facts
Birth Date
1966-06-13 1
Birth Year
1966 2
Birthplace
Leningrad, USSR (present day Saint Petersburg, Russia) 1
Nationality / Culture
Russian 1
Defining Contribution
Proved the Poincare conjecture and the geometrization conjecture, 2002 to 2003, by completing Richard Hamilton's Ricci flow program. Also proved the soul conjecture, posed by Jeff Cheeger and Detlef Gromoll, in 1994. 3
Notable Work
The entropy formula for the Ricci flow and its geometric applications (arXiv, November 2002); Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds (arXiv, March 2003); Finite extinction time for the solutions to the Ricci flow on certain three-manifolds (arXiv, July 2003) 3
Award
Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Prize, 2010 (declined) 3
Award
Fields Medal, 2006 (declined) 4
Cross-Tradition Connections

Proofs Credited

Sources
1. MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive
University of St Andrews, School of Mathematics and Statisticshttps://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Perelman/
Quote, https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Perelman/
Grigori Perelman is a Russian mathematician who proved the Poincare Conjecture and who refused to accept a Fields Medal or the $1 000 000 Clay Prize.
View the Source
2. Grigori Perelman (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia Foundationinfobox IPA
Quote, infobox IPA
Born Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman (1966-06-13) 13 June 1966 (age 60) Leningrad, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union Education Leningrad State University (PhD) Known for Proof of the soul conjecture, Poincare conjecture and geometrization of 3-manifolds
View the Source
3. Clay Mathematics Institute
Clay Mathematics Institutehttps://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/, Poincare Conjecture section (solved problems)
Quote, https://www.claymath.org/millennium-problems/, Poincare Conjecture section (solved problems)
Perelman's proof tells us that every three manifold is built from a set of standard pieces, each with one of eight well-understood geometries.
View the Source
3. Clay Mathematics Institute
Clay Mathematics InstituteProofs Credited: Poincare Conjecture, https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Poincare-press-release.pdfView the Source
4. Nature, Mathematician Declines Top Prize (2006)
Nature news staff, Nature, published online August 22, 2006, 2006View the Source
Nasar and Gruber, Manifold Destiny (2006)
Sylvia Nasar and David Gruber, The New Yorker, August 28, 2006 (reprinted with permission in Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 2007), 2006View the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Proofs Credited: Poincare Conjecture

In June 2006 Yau's students Xi-Ping Zhu and Huai-Dong Cao published a paper, filling the entire June 2006 issue of the Asian Journal of Mathematics which Yau co-edits, describing itself as completing the proof of the Poincare and geometrization conjectures. At a Beijing press conference the acting director of Yau's own mathematics institute credited Hamilton with over fifty percent, Perelman with about twenty five percent, and Yau, Zhu and Cao with about thirty percent, a division that does not even sum to one hundred. Yau said in a public lecture that in Perelman's work many key ideas were sketched or outlined with complete details often missing, and that Zhu and Cao's paper was a complete solution to the puzzle. Other mathematicians disputed this characterization at the time: John Morgan said Perelman had already done it and that his proof was complete and correct, and that he did not see that Zhu and Cao had done anything different; Perelman himself, asked about the Zhu-Cao paper, said it was not clear to him what new contribution they had made, and that Zhu appeared not to have quite understood the argument and reworked it.

A dissenting reading, from Shing-Tung Yau, Xi-Ping Zhu and Huai-Dong CaoSylvia Nasar and David Gruber, Nasar and Gruber, Manifold Destiny (2006), The New Yorker, August 28, 2006 (reprinted with permission in Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 2007), 2006
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.