Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Cantelli's Inequality

Probability and Statistics

Cantelli's Inequality, in probability theory, is an improved version of Chebyshev's inequality for one-sided tail bounds, giving a tighter bound on the probability that a random variable deviates from its mean in only one particular direction rather than either direction. It is named for the Italian mathematician Francesco Paolo Cantelli and is also known as the one-sided Chebyshev inequality.

Facts
Classification
Statement Form
Inequality 1
Proof Year
1928 2
Connections

Has Statement Form

Inequality, Concepts

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Source Cantelli's inequality, Wikipedia

Proved By

Source Cantelli's inequality, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Cantelli's inequality
WikipediaLead section, statement-form reference
Quote, Lead section, statement-form reference
In probability theory, Cantelli's inequality (also called the Chebyshev-Cantelli inequality and the one-sided Chebyshev inequality) is an improved version of Chebyshev's inequality for one-sided tail bounds.
View the Source
2. Cantelli's inequality, Wikipedia
  • History
    Francesco Paolo Cantelli who published it in 1928.
  • In Branch: Probability and Statistics, Lead sentence
    In probability theory, Cantelli's inequality (also called the Chebyshev-Cantelli inequality and the one-sided Chebyshev inequality
  • Proved By: Francesco Paolo Cantelli, Lead paragraph
    In probability theory, Cantelli's inequality (also called the Chebyshev-Cantelli inequality and the one-sided Chebyshev inequality) is an improved version
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.