Mathematics Atlas

How Proof Is Made
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Theorem

Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse Theorem

Logic and Foundations

The Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse Theorem describes a back-and-forth game, with the back-and-forth method introduced by Roland Fraisse and formulated as a game by Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, used to determine whether two mathematical structures are elementarily equivalent, meaning they satisfy exactly the same first-order sentences. Two players, conventionally called Spoiler and Duplicator, alternately choose elements from each structure, and the theorem states that Duplicator has a winning strategy in the game of every finite length exactly when the two structures are elementarily equivalent, making the game one of the principal tools for proving that certain properties cannot be expressed in first-order logic.

Facts
Statement
Two structures A and B are elementarily equivalent, meaning they satisfy exactly the same first-order sentences, if and only if the Duplicator player has a winning strategy in the Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game of every finite length n played between A and B, provided the underlying vocabulary of relation symbols is finite. 1
Proof Year
1961 1
Classification
Statement Form
Characterization Theorem 1
Connections

Has Statement Form

Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.

In Branch

Source Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game, Wikipedia
Sources
1. Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game, Wikipedia
  • Equivalence and inexpressibility section
    It is easy to prove that if Duplicator wins this game for all finite n, that is, A ∼ B, then A and B are elementarily equivalent.
  • History section, citation to Ehrenfeucht 1961
    An application of games to the completeness problem for formalized theories, A. Ehrenfeucht, Fundamenta Mathematicae 49 (1961), 129-141.
  • In Branch: Model Theory, Lead sentence
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.