Gentzen's consistency proof is a result in proof theory, published by Gerhard Gentzen in 1936, showing that the Peano axioms of first-order arithmetic contain no contradiction, provided that a separate system used in the argument is itself free of contradictions. That auxiliary system, primitive recursive arithmetic extended with quantifier-free transfinite induction up to the ordinal epsilon-naught, is neither weaker nor stronger than the Peano axioms, but Gentzen argued it avoids certain questionable modes of inference and so its own consistency is less controversial.
Facts
StatementIt shows that the Peano axioms of first-order arithmetic do not contain a contradiction (i.e. are "consistent"), as long as a certain other system used in the proof does not contain any contradictions either. 1 Classification
Statement Form Connections
Has Statement Form
Entity-backed identity for the statement-form enum value this theorem already carries, resolved to a mathematics concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The statement-form fact itself stays on the theorem unchanged.
In Branch
Source Gentzen's consistency proof - Wikipedia
Proved By
Source Gentzen's consistency proof - Wikipedia
Sources
1. Gentzen's consistency proof - Wikipedia
Lead section, opening sentence
It shows that the Peano axioms of first-order arithmetic do not contain a contradiction (i.e. are "consistent"), as long as a certain other system used in the proof does not contain any contradictions either.
Lead section, closing sentence
published by Gerhard Gentzen in 1936.
In Branch: Proof Theory, Lead sentence
Gentzen's consistency proof is a result of proof theory in mathematical logic, published by Gerhard Gentzen in 1936.
Proved By: Gerhard Gentzen, Lead paragraph
Gentzen's consistency proof is a result of proof theory in mathematical logic, published by Gerhard Gentzen in 1936. It shows that
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.